Sunday, September 29, 2013

Responses to Elements of Distance Education (September 29, 2013)

Responses to Elements of Distance Education

I have submitted responses to Elements of Distance Education were left for:


Nicolas Lapoujade -  http://lapoujade.wordpress.com/2013/09/26/global-diversity-vs-george-siemens/

Stacey Donaldson - http://staceydonaldson.wordpress.com/2013/09/25/elements-of-distance-education-diffusion/comment-page-1/#comment-7


Vaughn



Tuesday, September 24, 2013

Elements of Distance Education Diffusion (September 24, 2013)



Elements of Distance Education Diffusion * Blog Post #2
George Siemens discussed the growing acceptance of distance education in today’s corporate and educational spheres, including three possible elements of distance education that are creating more effective learning experiences and giving distance education an identity of its own distinct from F2F courses: (a) global diversity, (b) communication, and (c) collaborative interaction. Do you agree or disagree with his view?
Select one of these three elements for your reflection in this module and respond to the following in your blog:
  • How has this element evolved?
Collaborative interaction is an aspect of distance education that is growing acceptance among corporate and educational environments. George Siemens (Laureate Education, 2010) claims that online learners have practical experiences with new tools. Online learners are becoming comfortable with online discourse and lifelong learning (Anderson, 2011, p. 92). Online formats provide technological tools for helping learners construct new knowledge (Anderson, 2011, p. 94). Determinism is a technological philosophy where learners utilize media and technological resources as tools for shaping experiences and building learner capacities (Anderson, 2011, p. 9). Social determinism is another technological philosophy. Anderson (2011) asserts that educators place emphasis with the integration of technological artifacts within online settings. Emphasis goes towards how technology use affects social structures. Emphasis also goes towards how social and technological use shapes the form and content of student learning experiences (p. 97).  The philosophy behind technological determinism is to view technologies as causal agents for determining uses and having a pivotal role in social change (Anderson, 2011, p. 98). Positive views of collaboration with the use of online formats include formats for complex problem – solving abilities. The collaborative interaction is an opportunity for reflective deliberation (Anderson, 2011, p. 100).
  • What online tools are available today to facilitate these interactions among learners?
There are several online tools available today that facilitate and support interactions among learners. Anderson (2011) asserts that when instructors know their teaching and technology philosophies, they are able to impact rational thought, personal growth, or bring about political or social change (p. 111). Progressive methods of instruction utilize experimental, problem – solving, and situation learning approaches (Anderson, 2011, p. 103). Online tools to improve learning include WebCT®, Blackboard®, and Lotus Notes® (Anderson, 2011, p. 104). These tools provide an efficient design for an interactive partnership between the instructor and students. A humanist method of teaching utilizes group dynamics, group relations training, group processes, and workshops (Anderson, 2011, p. 106). The e–learning technologies can provide flexibility, and convenience for online learning. The radical design of instruction invokes difference - among political, economic, and social order in society. The instructional methods include dialogic encounters that lead to praxis. The activities allow learners to become enablers of radical social change (Anderson, 2011, pp. 108 – 109). The online learning tools to develop learning include WebCT®, Blackboard®, and Lotus Notes®, and Moodle (Anderson, 2011, p. 109). The communication tools allow for learners to communicate in a risk – free and trusting learning environment (Anderson, 2011, p. 109).
References:
Anderson, T. (Ed.). (2008). The theory and practice of online learning. (2nd ed.). Edmonton,
AB: Athabasca University Press.
Laureate Education, Inc. (2008). Elements of Distance Education Diffusion [Video].Baltimore,
MD: Author.

Sunday, September 15, 2013

Justification of Project Topic - Learning Assessment


Justification for Project Topic – Learning Assessment
            Assessments provide evidence to instructors for making important focusing adjustment decisions. Diane Chapman and Sophia Stone (2010) conduct a qualitative case study that investigates evaluation practices in distance learning environments. Distance learning environments can provide learners with experiences that combine immersion, collaboration, and aspects that support virtual human resource development (p. 666). Distance education provides an opportunity to incorporate more authentic forms of assessment where learners are able to construct their own knowledge and learn from each other. Distance learning provides an effective environment that bridges the gap between research and practice. Distance learning provides a real – life context for knowledge application (Chapman & Stone, 2010, p. 666).
            The article addresses assessment methods and techniques for measuring learning outcomes in distance education environments. Distance education instructors are using assessment as a tool to measure the effectiveness of the distance education platform as a learning space. However, there are limits to research on how to measure successful learning, transfer of learning, and achievement of learning outcomes within distance learning environments (Chapman & Stone, 2010, p. 667). Typically within distance education, instructors measure student learning outcomes through evaluation efforts that focus on knowledge, skill, affect changes, and transfer of learning skills (Chapman & Stone, 2010, p. 667). The evaluative products from learners include journals, reflective activities, projects, blogs, wikis, discussion artifacts, and characteristics affiliating with social engagement.  
The qualitative multiple case study investigates evaluation practices of in instructors teaching in distance learning environments. Chapman and Stone (2010) use interview data instructors teaching in six southeastern U.S. universities (p. 670). The research questions that guide the multiple case investigation are:
  • How do you evaluate student learning in a distance learning environment?
  • What methods do you use to measure learning outcomes?
The instructors represent a variety of disciplines which include the sciences, communication, and business management (Chapman & Stone, 2010, p. 670).     
The authors conduct a qualitative study which explores each participant’s values, beliefs, and perspective. Data collection processes include (a) documents, (b) archival records, (c) interviews, (d) direct observation, (e) physical artifacts, and (f) participant – observation (Chapman & Stone, 2010, p. 671). The study also includes purposeful sampling data consisting of (a) four hour interviews with each participant, direct observation, (b) follow – up telephone interviews with participants, (c) extensive field notes and journals, and (d) extensive field work during the distance learning observations (Chapman & Stone, 2010, p. 672).
            The results show that learners in distance learning environments experience performance – based learning. The learner performs real – life tasks that are observable and measurable with learning outcomes. Distance learning instructors use the real – life, tangible, measurable challenges for evaluating and judging the value of what their learners are able to perform (Chapman & Stone, 2010, p. 673). Learners in distance learning environments also become problem solvers who attain problem – based learning artifacts. Assessment measures include instructors asking their distance learners to demonstrate their learning by creating digital artifacts for problem – solving (Chapman & Stone, 2010, p. 673). Distance learning instructors within the study use authentic assessment measures to assess student learning outcomes. An example from an instructor is to have students find a problem that is both meaningful and relevant. The students are to contextualize learning around the problem. As an evaluation, each student creates a digital artifact of the solar system. Each student creates note cards for distributing to the other members of the distance learning audience. The students present their project to the general public (Chapman & Stone, 2010, p. 674). Other assessment choices distance learning instructors use include reflection journals, peer reviews, presentations with 3D display panels, interactive quizzes, surveys, blogs, and other displays that provide evidence of creativity and exploration within the learning process (Chapman & Stone, 2010, p. 674). Distant learning instructors also use social measures to assess student learning. Group –learning digital artifacts provide indicators of student achievement and learning outcomes (Chapman & Stone, 2010, p. 676).

Reference
Chapman, D. D., & Stone, S. J. (2010). Measurement of outcomes in virtual environments. Advances in Human Resources 12(6), 665–680. doi: 10.1177/1523422310394792
 

Friday, September 13, 2013

Responses to The Next Generation of Distance Education

Responses to The Next Generation of Distance Education


Responses were sent to the following classmates:

Segla Kossivi - http://skossivi.blogspot.com
Solita Shelton - http://solitashelton.blogspot.com/


Vaughn

Sunday, September 8, 2013

The Next Generation of Distance Education (September 8, 2013)

The Next Generation of Distance Education * Blog Post #1
  • After reading the three articles by Moller, Huett, Foshay, and Coleman, and listening to the Simonson video programs, compare and contrast the reasons these authors believe there is a need to evolve distance education to the next generation. Do you agree with their positions? Why or why not?
Distance education is becoming the equalizer to broaden student learning opportunities. Learners from different backgrounds work collaboratively to problem – solve. They delve into real – life situations and discover innovative concepts that impact social change. Moller, Huett, Foshay, and Coleman (2008) state that distance education allows instructors and learners to adopt potential individualization strategies that are not possible in the traditional classroom (p. 66). The challenge remains for practitioners to transform the craft of instructional technology and design into an engineering or science – style discipline (Moller, Huett, Forshay, and Coleman, 2008, p. 66). At the same time, the demand for professional development and support makes the implementation process challenging for practitioners. As distance learning opportunities evolve, learners will be able to transfer what they learn to real – life applications (Anderson, 2008, p. 39).

Distance education will continue to grow significantly. However, distance education will not replace traditional schools. There is a prediction that school training will include both face – to – face and distant learning environments. Simonson (2000) says that every student should have the opportunity to learn in acceptable and appropriate ways (p. 29). Employing a variety of technologies will help students achieve learning outcomes, and will also achieve equivalency (Simonson, 2000, p. 30). The goal of instructional planning is to make the sum of experiences for each learner equivalent. The goal of instructional planning is also to select instructional technologies that store and deliver the learning experiences effectively (Simonson, 2000, p. 30). Utilizing several resources is essential.

References:


Anderson, T. (Ed.). (2008). The theory and practice of online learning. (2nd ed.). Edmonton, AB: Athabasca University Press.

Huett, J., Moller, L., Foshay, W. & Coleman, C. (2008, September/October). The evolution of distance education: Implications for instructional design on the potential of the Web (Part 3: K12).

Laureate Education, Inc. (2008). Distance Education: The Next Generation [Video].Baltimore, MD: Author.

Simonson, M. (2000). Making decisions: The use of electronic technology in online classrooms. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 84, 29–34. Retrieved from Academic Search Premier database.