Friday, September 12, 2014

Sunday, August 31, 2014

Module 1 Assignment Blog Post on Identifying an Emerged Technology

Module 1 Assignment Blog Post on Identifying an Emerged Technology

          An emerging technology over the last few years that supports learning and productivity are local storage drives or USB flash drives. Many teachers and students use flash drives to store their assignments and information. Dr. Thornburg (2013b) states that rotating media drives such as flash drives continue their advancement in capabilities as an alternate technology. 
Even though educators and students use flash drives regularly, there are still challenges that continue when comparing flash drives with traditional hard drives. Thornburg (2013b) states that flash drives in comparison with computer hard drives (a) are much higher in cost/bit, (b) have smaller total storage capacity, (c) limited number of read/write cycles. Other concerns from educators are that students forget to bring their flash drives to school on a daily basis. Even though the cost for flash drives continues to go down, they can still be costly, and not all students have access to the devices.
The emerging technology supports social organizations such as schools. Dr. Thornburg (2013b) notes that the memory device on the flash drive uses little power, it is light weight and continues to drop in price. Designers continue to add memory onto the device. Flash drives also allow users to spare the use of precious memory from their hard drive.  
Although USB flash drives allow users to store continuous information, the devices may still carry an encryption weakness. Clipper (2009) notes Kingsley-Hughes report that the primary producers of the flash drives will have to recall or update their software. Users will need to check their drives and proceed cautiously with sensitive data. Another pitfall is that the strength of the USB flash drives may also be their weakness. The drives are small in order to assist portability. They are also easy to lose.

 
Over the summer, The Montgomery County Public School System rolls out their Strategic Technology Plan for 2014 – 2016. The plan describes the multiple year efforts to provide all students with access to mobile computers within a cloud-based learning platform to enhance student creativity and promote student collaboration. Thornburg (2013b) says that providers such as Dropbox and Google Drive, allow users to store their data in the “cloud." All students within the county school system will be able to setup their cloud accounts through Google. Rogers (2003) points out that clarifying of an emerging technology takes place during implementation. Members within the organization will begin to gradually to define meaning with the new idea. Students in grades three, five, and six, as well as those in high school social studies classes, will begin using the technology in the classroom during the 2014-2015 school year. 
Creating 21st Century Learning Spaces

References
Clipper, A. (2009). The disadvantages of a USB flash drive. EHow. 
Montgomery County Public Schools. (2014). Office of the chief technology officer – 21
century learning  strategic technology plan. Retrieved from http://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/technology/technologyplan.aspx
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.) New York, NY: Free Press.
Thornburg, D. (2013b). Current trends in educational technology. Lake Barrington, IL:
Thornburg Center for Space Exploration.





Wednesday, November 13, 2013

Video Presentation: Introduction of Keynote Speaker on Learner Assessment and Distance Education - George Siemens


Module 6 Video:
Vaughn Bradley's Introduction of Keynote Speaker on
Learner Assessment and Distance Education –
George Siemens


References

Ajunwas, O. S. U. (2010) Integration group – self evaluation in open and distance learning

system. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 11(4) 76 - 80.

Amway, K.M.Y., Mayadas, A. F. (2010). The sloan – c pillars: towards a balanced approach to

measuring organizational learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 14(2)

45 - 52.

Chapman, D. D., & Stone, S. J. (2010). Measurement of outcomes in virtual environments.

Advances in Human Resources 12(6), 665–680. doi: 10.1177/1523422310394792

Debuse, J. C. W., & Lawley, M. (2011). Using innovative technology to develop sustainable

assessment practices in marketing education. Journal of Marketing Education 33, 160 –

170. doi: 10.1177/02773475311410848

Durrington, V. A., Berryhill, A., & Swafford, J. (2006).


College Teaching, 54(1), 190−193. Use the Academic Search Premier database, and

search using the article's Accession Number: 19754742

Fahy, P. (2008). Characteristics of interactive online learning media. In T. Anderson (Ed.), The

theory and practice of online learning (pp. 167 – 199). Edmonton, AB: Athabasca

University.

Jonassen, D. H., Carr, C., & Yueh, H. (1998). Computers as mindtools for engaging learners in

critical thinking. TechTrends, 43(2), 24 – 32.

Laureate Education, Inc. (2008). Principles of Distance Education. Baltimore, MD: Author.

 Learnonline (2007). Ten minute lecture – George Siemens – curatorial teaching. Retrieved from


McCarthy, W. C., Green, P. J., & Fitch, T. (2010). An examination of collaborative learning

assessment through dialogue (CLAD). Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 23(2).

McGreal, R. & Elliott, M. Technologies of Online Learning (E-Learning). In T. Anderson (Ed.),

The theory and practice of online learning (pp. 143 – 165). Edmonton, AB: Athabasca

University.

Moller, L. (2008). Static and dynamic technological tools. [Unpublished Paper].

Moller, L., & Huett, J.B. (Eds.). (2012). The next generation of distance education unconstrained

learning. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-1785-9


Oblinger, D. G., Barone, C. A., & Hawkins, B. L. (2001). Distributed education and its

challenges: An overview. American Council on Education and Educause.

Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2007). Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for

the virtual classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2005). Collaborating online: Learning together in community. San

Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Parker, N. (2011). The Quality Dilemma in Online Education Revisited. In Anderson, T. (Ed.).

(2011). The theory and practice of online learning. (2nd ed.). Edmonton, AB: Athabasca University Press.

 [Photographs of George Siemens]. (ca. 2007 – 2012). George Siemens Learning Analytics


Rida, F. (2012). Good Feeling. On Wild ones Flo Rida [MP3 file]. Floor City New York, NY:

Atlantic Records.

Siemens, G. (2008, January). Learning and knowing in networks: Changing roles for educators

and designers IT Forum.

Simonson, M. (2000). Making decisions: The use of electronic technology in online classrooms.

New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 84, 29–34. Retrieved from Academic Search

Premier database.

Swan, K. (2004). Relationships between interactions and learning in online environments. The

Sloan Consortium.

Willink, K. G., & Jacobs, J. M. (2012). Teaching for change: articulating, profiling, and

assessing transformative learning through communicative capabilities. Journal of

Transformative Education 9, 143 – 164. doi: 10.1177/1541344611436012

Wednesday, October 23, 2013

Responses to Engaging Learners with New Strategies and Tool (October 23, 2013)

Responses to Engaging Learners with New Strategies and Tools

I posted comments to the following classmates:

Solita Shelton -

http://solitashelton.blogspot.com/2013/10/tools-and-strategies-in-distance.html?showComment=1382583263727#c8278481547449675022

Ann Kelley -

http://annkelley8.wordpress.com/2013/10/17/educ-7102-module-4-graphic-organizer/comment-page-1/#comment-40

Vaughn